The U.S. Women's National Team's fight for equal pay and treatment is just the latest chapter in a long history of women footballers.
This year, the largest percentage of Australians since 2006 agreed with the following statement: “global warming is a serious and pressing problem. We should begin taking steps now even if this involves significant cost.”
Journalists and pundits alike believed that this sentiment would affect this weekend’s elections and that Australians might overwhelmingly select a party with the most aggressive approach toward climate change.
But that’s not what happened.
From The New York Times:
But over all, Australians shrugged off the warming seas killing the Great Barrier Reef and the extreme drought punishing farmers. On Saturday, in a result that stunned most analysts, they re-elected the conservative coalition that has long resisted plans to sharply cut down on carbon emissions and coal.
In an opinion piece for the ABC, political science professor Matt McDonald analyzed more of the results.
And we saw a rise of only around 0.5 per cent of the primary vote for the party with the most progressive and ambitious climate policy: the Greens. More consequentially, of course, we saw the re-election of a Government with limited ambition on emissions reductions.
What issues were more salient to voters? How will the conservative government address an issue that constituents care about — but that didn’t drive their ballot?
We bring you the latest on the results of the Australian elections.
- James Glenday North America correspondent, the Australian Broadcast Corporation; @jamesglenday
Most Recent Shows
In the U.S., there’s another kind of caravan crossing borders in search of survival: diabetic Americans traveling to Canada to get cheaper insulin.
We talk to the magazine phenom about Project Runway, leaving journalism and beyond.
In 1965, Reverend James Reeb was murdered in Selma, Alabama, at the height of the civil rights movement. Fifty years later, new details have emerged.