Rex Tillerson is ready to talk.
Divisive discourse. Trump’s tweets. “Fake news.”
The 2016 Election revealed the surprising ways the internet can shape Americans’ political views. Voters were exposed to strategically placed misinformation, propaganda posts composed by automated programs and an increased volume on hate speech and hostile political rhetoric.
Stanford law professor Nate Persily has written about this phenomenon in a journal article called “Can Democracy Survive The Internet?”
If what we saw in 2016 was just the beginning, what can we expect the next national election to be like? With all the political noise the internet is generating, can true democracy still be heard?
- Nate Persily James B. McClatchy professor of law, Stanford University
- Zeynep Tufekci Author, "Twitter and Tear Gas: The Power and Fragility of Networked Protest"; associate professor, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill's School of Information and Library Science; faculty associate at the Harvard Berkman Klein Center
- Wael Ghonim Internet activist
- Aaron Sharockman Executive director, Politifact
Most Recent Shows
The Alabama Senate, more pressure on Robert Mueller and movement on the tax bill.
Presidents Trump and Truman get compared a lot. Here's why.
How will this game of Fox and mouse affect what you watch?